Brokers / MARKETRIP / Review

MARKETRIP Review

No verified license 🇬🇧 United Kingdom Est. 2020
75/100
Severe risk scam risk
Visit MARKETRIP ↗
Min. deposit$250
Max. leverageUp to 1:400
Regulators0
Founded2020
Country🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Withdrawal reports6

MARKETRIP in a nutshell

The real-review record is overwhelmingly negative, with zero positive mentions across any topic. Numerous users describe Marketrip as a scam that solicits deposits through friendly calls from apparent UK numbers, then blocks withdrawals and disappears. Former employees confirm it is a large-scale fraudulent operation preying on inexperienced traders. The consistent pattern of denied withdrawals and stolen funds leaves no room for confidence.

FXCanary rates MARKETRIP at 75/100 scam risk (Severe risk), based on regulation & licensing, fund-safety signals, company transparency, complaint history and real user feedback.

See the open scoring breakdown →

Pros

  • No standout strengths identified

Cons

  • Any trader seeking a regulated, trustworthy broker
  • Inexperienced or risk-averse traders
  • Anyone unwilling to lose their entire deposit

Account types & conditions

Account tiers and trading conditions on record for MARKETRIP.

AccountMin. depositMax. leverageMin. spreadCommission
VIP - Invitation only 250,000,00 Up to 1:400 -- --
Diamond 100,000,00 Up to 1:400 -- --
Platinum 50,000,00 Up to 1:300 -- --
Gold 15,000.00 Up to 1:300 -- --
Silver 5,000.00 up to 1:200 -- --
Basic 250.00 up to 1:100 -- --

How We Reviewed MarketRip

FXCanary conducted a thorough review of MarketRip by cross-checking multiple public and industry databases for licensing information, analyzing the structured product data the broker claims to offer, and, most critically, examining the real-world experiences of users who have traded with the company. We consulted regulatory registers including the FCA, CySEC, and other international authorities, and found no record of MarketRip holding any license.

We augmented this regulatory check with an extensive sweep of user reviews from platforms such as Trustpilot, where MarketRip holds a 1.8/5 rating from 16 reviews. We also noted a complete absence of feedback on Forex Peace Army, which itself is unusual for a broker that has been operating for several years. Finally, we factored in our proprietary Scam Risk Score, which weighs licensing gaps, complaint volumes, and structural red flags to produce a composite risk assessment.

Company Background and History

MarketRip emerged in late October 2020, claiming a United Kingdom address and predominantly using UK-based phone numbers to contact prospective clients. However, our investigation could not verify any physical presence or substantive corporate footprint. The broker reports having zero employees, which suggests it may operate through an outsourced or virtually dormant network.

The lack of a verifiable office, combined with anonymous corporate registration details, is a serious concern. Legitimate brokers typically maintain transparent head office locations, disclose key personnel, and register with national company registries in a manner that can be independently validated. MarketRip provides none of these reassurances.

Reviews consistently allege that the broker is not actually based in the UK despite its phone numbers, with multiple users claiming it is likely operated from Eastern Europe. Former employees who have come forward have described it as part of a larger network of scam operations, further undermining any confidence in the company’s stated background.

Regulatory Status: No License, No Protection

MarketRip holds zero verified licenses from any regulatory body. This is the single most critical factor any trader should consider. Regulation by a respected authority such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC provides a framework of mandatory client protections, including segregated client accounts, negative balance protection, and participation in investor compensation schemes.

Without a license, none of these safeguards apply. If a trader deposits funds with MarketRip, they have no legal recourse if the broker disappears, refuses withdrawals, or engages in fraudulent activity. The absence of regulatory oversight also means there is no guarantee that the broker follows fair trading practices, maintains adequate capital reserves, or keeps client funds separate from its own operating capital.

In our review, we checked the registries of the FCA, FSCA, ASIC, CySEC, and several offshore regulators, and MarketRip was not listed under any variation of its name. The broker’s own website makes no prominent regulatory disclosure, which is a hallmark of unregulated operations that seek to attract clients without drawing attention to their legal status.

Account Tiers: High Barriers, High Leverage

MarketRip advertises six account types: Basic, Silver, Gold, Platinum, Diamond, and VIP. The minimum deposit requirements are steep, ranging from $250 for the Basic tier to $250,000 for the VIP invitation-only tier. In an industry where many reputable brokers allow traders to start with as little as $10 or $100, these thresholds are unusually high, especially for an unregulated broker.

The leverage ratios are equally aggressive: up to 1:100 on the Basic account, scaling to 1:400 on the Diamond and VIP accounts. High leverage is a double-edged sword; while it can magnify gains, it also dramatically amplifies losses. In an unregulated environment, there are no rules requiring the broker to close positions when a client’s equity falls below a certain threshold, so a trader can lose far more than their initial deposit in practice.

Conspicuously, MarketRip does not disclose the spreads, commissions, or other trading costs associated with any of these accounts. This opacity is a major warning sign. Without knowing the bid-ask spread or any per-trade fees, it is impossible to calculate the true cost of trading or compare MarketRip’s offering to that of a legitimate broker.

Deposit and Withdrawal Methods: A Black Box

The broker provides no information on how clients can deposit funds or, more importantly, withdraw them. Reputable brokers clearly list accepted payment methods—such as bank wire, credit/debit cards, Skrill, Neteller, or cryptocurrency—along with processing times and any associated fees. MarketRip’s silence on this topic is telling.

The user reviews we analyzed paint a grim picture of deposits being collected through wire transfers or card payments, only for withdrawal requests to be ignored or outright denied. One reviewer described depositing £250 as a ‘small’ initial sum, being charmed by the account manager, and then never seeing their money again. Another recounted losing their entire deposit because the broker claimed it was a “5-year license fee.”

The absence of clear withdrawal procedures, combined with user reports of blocked withdrawals, indicates a high probability that clients will not be able to retrieve their funds. Traders should treat any deposit sent to MarketRip as money that could be lost permanently.

Instruments and Platforms: What We Know

MarketRip does not disclose the instruments it offers for trading. There is no mention of forex pairs, commodities, indices, stocks, or cryptocurrencies on its website or in any available documentation. This lack of transparency is unusual and prevents traders from assessing whether the broker provides access to the markets they are interested in.

Similarly, the trading platform is not identified. Other brokers are generally eager to highlight whether they offer MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, or proprietary web platforms. Here, there is complete silence. User reviews suggest that if a platform existed, it was rudimentary or non-functional, with one reviewer warning that the website itself is a “total scam” and cautioning against uploading any documents.

A credible broker has nothing to hide about its trading infrastructure. The failure to specify even the basic platform and instrument list reinforces the conclusion that MarketRip is not a genuine brokerage operation.

Fees and Spreads: Hidden Costs

In addition to the undisclosed spreads and commissions noted earlier, MarketRip provides no information on overnight financing charges (swap rates), inactivity fees, or any other potential costs. This is a stark deviation from industry norms, where brokers publish detailed fee schedules or at least indicate the typical spread ranges for major instruments.

User reviews mention surprise fees, with one trader being told that their initial deposit was actually a “5-year license” and was not refundable or usable for trading. Another user cautioned that any deposit would be “stolen” with no chance of recovery. These anecdotes suggest that MarketRip’s fee model is designed to strip clients of their funds under opaque pretenses rather than to facilitate fair trading.

What Real User Reviews Tell Us

Across all categories, user feedback on MarketRip is unanimously negative. Not a single review praised the broker, its platform, its customer support, or its trading conditions. The dominant theme is fraud: users describe being cold-called from a London number, building a rapport with a friendly-sounding account manager, and being persuaded to deposit increasingly larger sums.

Once deposits are made, the tone shifts. Reviewers report that attempts to withdraw funds are met with excuses, aggressive responses, or complete silence. One reviewer stated: “They will fleece you for everything you have if you let them. DO NOT EVER CONSIDER THEM AS THEY ARE FRAUDSTERS.” Another declared: “This website marketrip is a total scam and any good reports are probably their own.”

Several reviews are particularly noteworthy because they come from individuals claiming to be former employees. One stated: “As a former employee of this company, I am truly sorry for not being able to speak up earlier… The company is way bigger than just Brokerz.co.” This internal whistleblower account lends credibility to the pattern of complaints and suggests that the fraudulent activity is systematic and widespread.

The sheer consistency of the complaints—spanning scam allegations, deposit theft, withdrawal blockages, and aggressive tactics—leaves no ambiguity. MarketRip’s user review record is not just poor; it is catastrophically damning.

Industry Scores and Our Assessment

MarketRip’s Trustpilot score of 1.8 out of 5, based on 16 reviews, is the lowest possible tier and aligns perfectly with the voice of the individual user complaints. Forex Peace Army, another respected review aggregator, has no rating at all for MarketRip, which prevents triangulation but does not conflict with the Trustpilot picture.

Our proprietary Scam Risk Score assigns MarketRip a 75 out of 100, which falls in the “Severe” risk category. This score reflects the combined weight of zero regulatory licenses, extensive user complaints focused on withdrawal denial and fraud, a non-transparent business structure, and no verifiable physical footprint. It is exceptionally rare for a broker to score this high on our risk scale, indicating that the threat to client capital is extreme.

Verdict: A Severe-Risk Operation

FXCanary’s review of MarketRip leaves no room for cautious optimism. The broker is unregulated, untransparent, and, by all available evidence, systematically defrauds its clients. The high minimum deposit requirements, combined with high leverage and zero fee disclosure, appear designed not to facilitate trading but to extract as much capital as possible from unsuspecting victims.

We advise all traders to avoid MarketRip entirely. Do not provide personal documentation, as it may be misused. Do not send any money. If you have already deposited funds, you should cease all communication, report the incident to your local financial regulator and anti-fraud authorities, and contact your bank or payment provider to explore possible chargeback options. The likelihood of recovering funds is unfortunately low, but swift action can sometimes help.

For those seeking a legitimate brokerage experience, we recommend working only with brokers that are licensed by top-tier regulators and that demonstrate transparent operations, clear fee structures, and a positive community reputation. MarketRip meets none of these criteria, and our assessment is that it represents an immediate and severe danger to retail traders.

What real traders report

Aggregated from 16 independent reviews across Trustpilot and Forex Peace Army.

Most praised
  • Little positive feedback on record
Most complained about
  • Scam concerns · 12 mentions
  • Platform & app · 9 mentions
  • Deposits & funding · 6 mentions
  • Withdrawals · 5 mentions
  • Profit / payouts · 5 mentions

Trustpilot’s 1.8 rating aligns conclusively with our own research and the consistent user reports of fraud.

Scam-risk findings

75/100
Severe riskFXCanary scam-risk score · lower is safer
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • Withdrawal complaints in ~38% of recent reviews

Our scoring method is published in full and weighs regulation, fund safety, company age, clone reports, complaints and independent reviews. FXCanary takes no payment from any broker it rates.

← Full MARKETRIP profile, live data & all user reviews