Brokers  /  FULLMARKETS

FULLMARKETS

High risk
🇬🇧 United Kingdom · 2-5 years · since 2022-01-24 · Beradora Ltd
Unregulated
Visit site ↗
Independent ratingshow third parties score this broker
WikiFX1.49/10
Trustpilot1.9/5
Forex Peace Army/5
50
High risk
Scam Risk Scoremonitored · 2026-07-05
Lower riskHigher risk
  • No verified regulatory license on file
How this score is calculated — view the open algorithm

A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.

FactorScoreWeight
Regulation & licensing8535%
Company age4515%
Clone / impersonation012%
Withdrawal & exposure complaints012%
Offshore registration108%
Transparency (site/info/social)5310%
Real-user sentiment908%

Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.

Company
Legal nameBeradora Ltd
Headquarters🇬🇧 United Kingdom
Founded2022-01-24
Years operating2-5 years
Employees0
Official websitefullmarkets.com
Trading conditions
Avg execution speed0 ms
Avg slippage0
Swap rating
Trading cost rating
Monitored traders0
Monitored orders0
Funding & instruments
Deposit methods
Withdrawal methods
Instruments
Registered address
33 George Street, London, W1U 3QP, United Kingdom

Regulation & licenses · 0

No valid regulatory license found — high caution advised.

Review analysis AI

FXCanary's review of the real user record reveals a uniform wall of negativity. Every complaint, without exception, raises severe red flags—from outright scam accusations and stolen deposits to harassment and data-protection violations. Reports of Serbian cold-callers using AnyDesk to hijack computers add a layer of active fraud that goes beyond mere poor service. In our assessment, there is not a single redeeming user experience to offset the overwhelming chorus of warnings.

Not for
  • Retail investors
  • Beginners
  • Security-conscious traders
Period:
What users complain about
Where reviewers are from
🇩🇪 DE2
GR2
🇺🇸 US1
SE1
EE1
🇬🇧 GB1
Positive vs negative · last 5 months Pos Neg
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Jun

Real user reviews

Similar brokers

About FULLMARKETS

Who is FULLMARKETS?

FULLMARKETS is a trading name of Beradora Ltd, a company incorporated in the United Kingdom on 24 January 2022. Its registered address is 33 George Street, London, W1U 3QP, a known business centre location in the Marylebone area that is frequently used for virtual office and mail-forwarding services.

As of the latest review by FXCanary, Beradora Ltd lists zero employees on public record. This indicates that the company does not maintain a substantial operational workforce—a notable detail for a firm purportedly offering financial services that involve handling client funds.

Regulatory Status

Despite its UK registration, FULLMARKETS holds no licence or authorisation from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or any other recognised financial regulator. This means it is not permitted to offer investment services to retail clients in the United Kingdom.

Without regulatory oversight, clients are not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) or any other investor protection framework. The absence of a legal licence strips away standard safeguards such as segregated client accounts, negative balance protection and independent dispute resolution.

Trading Offerings and Platforms

FULLMARKETS does not publicly disclose any details about its trading accounts, platforms or financial instruments. There is no verifiable information on minimum deposit requirements, leverage, spreads or the available asset classes such as forex, CFDs, indices or cryptocurrencies.

This opacity makes it impossible to compare its offering with other brokers. Legitimate firms typically publish clear account tier specifications, platform choices (such as MetaTrader 4/5 or proprietary web-based interfaces) and detailed product schedules. FULLMARKETS’ lack of such basics is a significant transparency gap.

Deposits, Withdrawals and Funding Methods

Information regarding deposit and withdrawal methods is similarly absent from the broker’s public materials. There are no indications of supported payment channels such as bank transfer, credit/debit cards, e-wallets or cryptocurrencies.

Without published policies on withdrawal processing times, fees or minimum withdrawal amounts, prospective clients have no way to gauge the ease or reliability of moving funds in and out of the brokerage. This lack of clarity, combined with user complaints of being unable to recover deposits, raises immediate concerns.

Target Audience and Marketing Approach

Given the reliance on cold-calling and aggressive sales tactics described by reviewers, FULLMARKETS appears to target unsophisticated or first-time investors who may not be aware of standard regulatory protections.

The complaints indicate that agents often push for remote desktop access via software like AnyDesk, a known technique in investment scams to execute unauthorised transactions or steal sensitive information. This behaviour suggests that the broker actively seeks vulnerable individuals rather than catering to a professional clientele.

Company Background – A Closer Look

Beradora Ltd’s registration details reveal a minimal corporate footprint. With a filing date in early 2022, no recorded employees and a generic London business address, it matches the profile of a shelf company or shell entity rather than a functioning brokerage.

Public registries show no senior management, no physical branch locations and no evidence of operational infrastructure such as a dealing desk or compliance department. For a company offering financial services, this skeleton structure is highly unusual and raises doubts about its ability to deliver reliable trade execution or safekeeping of assets.

Prudent Next Steps for Potential Clients

For any trader still considering FULLMARKETS despite the lack of transparent information, standard due diligence steps are strongly advised. First, verify the broker’s claimed regulatory status directly with the financial authority it claims to be under—in this case an independent check is vital because no regulator has been disclosed.

Second, request written details of account types, spreads and funding methods, and test the withdrawal process with a small sum early in the relationship. Third, thoroughly research online reviews and complaints across multiple platforms to build a complete picture of other users’ experiences. Without these verifications, clients risk entering a financial arrangement with little to no recourse should problems arise.

Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full FULLMARKETS review