Brokers  /  STS Royal

STS Royal

Severe risk
🇻🇨 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines · 5-10 years · since 2020-10-19 · STS Royal Ltd
Unregulated
Visit site ↗
75
Severe risk
Scam Risk Scoremonitored · 2026-07-05
Lower riskHigher risk
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • Registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (offshore, light oversight)
  • Withdrawal complaints in ~47% of recent reviews
How this score is calculated — view the open algorithm

A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.

FactorScoreWeight
Regulation & licensing8535%
Company age2215%
Clone / impersonation012%
Withdrawal & exposure complaints6612%
Offshore registration808%
Transparency (site/info/social)5010%
Real-user sentiment908%

Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.

Company
Legal nameSTS Royal Ltd
Headquarters🇻🇨 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Founded2020-10-19
Years operating5-10 years
Employees0
Official websitestsroyal.com
Trading conditions
Avg execution speed0 ms
Avg slippage0
Swap rating
Trading cost rating
Monitored traders0
Monitored orders0
Funding & instruments
Deposit methods · --
Withdrawal methods · --
Instruments--

Regulation & licenses · 0

No valid regulatory license found — high caution advised.

Account types · 5

AccountMax leverageMin. depositMin. spreadCommissionEA
Platinum--$100,000 – $499,999----
Gold--$25,000 – $99,999----
Silver--$10,000 – $24,999----
Basic--$2,500 – $9,999----
Explorer--$250 –$2,000----

Review analysis AI

The review record is overwhelmingly negative, with every category carrying serious allegations. Users consistently describe blocked withdrawals, high-pressure deposit demands, and a complete breakdown of communication once they attempt to retrieve funds. The pattern of complaints—from deceptive sales tactics to vanished account managers—signals a high-risk operation rather than a legitimate brokerage.

Not for
  • Retail traders seeking a regulated, transparent broker
  • Anyone unwilling to risk complete loss of deposited funds
  • Traders who value responsive customer support and reliable withdrawals
Period:
What users complain about
Where reviewers are from
🇬🇧 GB7
Mexico2
🇦🇪 AE1
CY1
🇫🇷 FR1
SE1
Positive vs negative · last 9 months Pos Neg
Sep
Nov
Dec
Feb
May
Jun
Aug
Dec
Sep

Real user reviews

Similar brokers

What STS Royal says about itself as stated by the broker · not independently verified by FXCanary

About STS Royal

The broker presents itself as a crypto CFD broker operating under STS Royal Ltd, a company registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It claims to offer clients access to a range of tradable financial instruments through web-based trading platforms.

Regulatory Claims

According to the broker, it is based in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction often used by offshore financial services firms. No specific regulatory license or authority is mentioned on its public materials.

Account Types

The company advertises five live account tiers: Explorer (min. deposit $250–$2,000), Basic ($2,500–$9,999), Silver ($10,000–$24,999), Gold ($25,000–$99,999), and Platinum ($100,000–$499,999). It does not publicly disclose typical spreads, leverage, or commissions for any of these accounts.

Trading Platforms and Instruments

STS Royal states that it provides a web-based trading platform. The specific instruments offered are not detailed in its marketing materials, nor is any third‑party platform (such as MetaTrader) named.

About STS Royal

Company Overview

STS Royal is a trading name of STS Royal Ltd, a company founded on 19 October 2020 and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The broker describes itself as a provider of crypto CFD trading services, aiming to give retail clients access to various financial instruments through a web‑based platform. Despite its relatively recent entry into the market, the firm has already attracted a very low 1.9‑star rating on Trustpilot from over 40 user reviews.

The broker’s headquarters are located offshore, a common choice among firms that operate with minimal regulatory oversight. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines does not maintain a financial services regulator for forex brokers, which means any entity incorporated there does not require a licence to offer trading services to international clients. STS Royal does not list any regulatory authority on its website, and our check of international licencing databases returned no active registrations. This absence of oversight is a critical detail for any potential client to weigh carefully.

Regulatory Status

As of our latest review, STS Royal holds no verifiable licence from any recognised financial regulator. While the company is legally incorporated in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, that incorporation does not imply any supervision by a financial conduct authority. The jurisdiction is frequently used by brokers who wish to avoid the stringent capital, reporting, and client‑fund protection requirements of tier‑1 regulators such as the FCA, CySEC, or ASIC.

In the absence of a licence, traders have no access to an external ombudsman, investor compensation scheme, or mandatory segregated client accounts. This means that if a dispute arises—over withdrawals, trade execution, or account management—clients have very limited legal recourse. The regulatory vacuum is a primary factor behind the broker’s elevated risk profile.

Account Types

STS Royal advertises five live trading accounts, each named after a precious metal to suggest tiered exclusivity. The entry‑level Explorer account requires a minimum deposit of $250 to $2,000, while the highest‑tier Platinum account demands between $100,000 and $499,999. These ranges are unusually wide and, in the case of the top two tiers, suggest a focus on high‑net‑worth individuals or those willing to deposit very large sums.

Notably, the broker does not publicly disclose any of the trading conditions that normally differentiate account levels—such as spreads, leverage, commissions, or swap rates—on its marketing materials. This lack of transparency makes it impossible for a trader to compare the true cost of trading across the accounts or to evaluate whether the higher minimum deposits are justified by a superior trading environment. Without published figures, prospective clients are effectively being asked to deposit significant capital on faith alone.

Trading Platform and Instruments

According to the company, trading is conducted via a web‑based platform. No specific third‑party software—such as MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, or cTrader—is named, which is unusual for a modern brokerage. The absence of a well‑known platform means clients cannot independently verify the software’s quality, security, or transparency, nor can they rely on the large user communities that typically form around established platforms.

The range of tradable instruments is not specified on the broker’s website. While the firm mentions crypto CFDs, there is no detail on which forex pairs, commodities, indices, or individual equities might be available. For a trader, this lack of disclosure makes it impossible to determine whether the broker can support a particular strategy or diversification need.

Funding and Withdrawals

The company does not list its deposit or withdrawal methods on its public‑facing materials. There is no information regarding credit/debit cards, bank wires, e‑wallets, or cryptocurrency transfers. The absence of clear funding information is a red flag, as legitimate brokers typically make this information easily accessible so that clients can verify the speed, cost, and security of transactions before committing funds.

Equally concerning is the complete silence on withdrawal procedures, processing times, and any applicable fees. In the user review record, multiple complaints centre on an inability to withdraw funds—clients describe their requests being ignored for months and demand for unexpected ‘processing fees’. This pattern suggests that even if a trader manages to deposit, retrieving profits or even the original capital is far from guaranteed.

Who Is STS Royal For?

Given the absence of regulatory protection, the opaque account structures, and the alarming user feedback, STS Royal cannot be recommended for the vast majority of retail traders. The minimum deposit tiers, especially the Silver, Gold, and Platinum accounts, imply the broker is targeting investors with high disposable capital who may be less sensitive to risk. However, the lack of any meaningful consumer safeguards makes this an unsuitable choice for anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire deposit.

Experienced traders who are familiar with offshore, unregulated environments and who are willing to treat any committed capital as a high‑risk speculation might consider it, but only after exhaustive independent due diligence. For anyone else—particularly beginners, retirees, or those trading their primary savings—the risks are simply too high.

Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full STS Royal review