A transparent weighted score from objective public data — each factor scored 0–100 (higher = riskier), combined by the weights below.
| Factor | Score | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation & licensing | 8 | 35% |
| Company age | 92 | 15% |
| Clone / impersonation | 0 | 12% |
| Withdrawal & exposure complaints | 48 | 12% |
| Offshore registration | 80 | 8% |
| Transparency (site/info/social) | 50 | 10% |
Based on public regulatory records, industry databases and independent reviews (Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army). Exit Risk reflects recent negative momentum in real reviews. A risk estimate from public data, not a definitive legal judgment; brokers may request a correction.
| Regulator | License type | License No. | Region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSCA | Derivatives Trading License (EP) | 54978 | South Africa | Regulated |
| FCA | Inst Forex Execution (STP) | 833414 | United Kingdom | Regulated |
| Account | Max leverage | Min. deposit | Min. spread | Commission | EA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro | 1:1000 | $100 | From 0.1 | -- | ✓ |
| Micro | 1:1000 | $0 | From 1.6 | No | ✓ |
| Core | 1:1000 | $0 | From 1.6 | No | ✓ |
Across 3 recent Trustpilot reviews, 100% are 1–2 star. The single most common complaint is being unable to withdraw funds (2 reports) — the classic warning sign in forex.
0RKX is a forex and CFD broker based in Saint Lucia, with records dating to 2026-01-08. It reports oversight from FCA, FSCA.
FXCanary’s verdict is “Guarded.” There are enough red flags that we’d urge caution before depositing.
Overview compiled by FXCanary from regulatory records and public data. full RKX review