Cryptokartal Review

No verified license 🇻🇨 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Est. 2019
50/100
High risk scam risk
Visit Cryptokartal ↗
Min. deposit
Max. leverage
Regulators0
Founded2019
Country🇻🇨 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Withdrawal reports0

Cryptokartal in a nutshell

The dominant signal from real-user reviews is overwhelmingly negative, with multiple reviewers outright calling the broker a scam. Specific complaints include inability to withdraw deposited funds and experienced account wipeouts after challenging the broker. Only one positive mention exists, which lacks detail and may not be reliable.

FXCanary rates Cryptokartal at 50/100 scam risk (High risk), based on regulation & licensing, fund-safety signals, company transparency, complaint history and real user feedback.

See the open scoring breakdown →

Pros

  • No standout strengths identified

Cons

  • Security-focused traders
  • Beginners
  • Anyone requiring regulated fund protection

How FXCanary Investigated Cryptokartal

Our review of Cryptokartal was built from multiple independent angles. We cross-checked the broker’s registration details in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines against corporate registries, searched for any regulatory licences in major financial centres, and scoured complaints databases, industry forums, and Trustpilot for real-user feedback. We also examined the broker’s own website and company disclosures to understand what it claims to offer.

The structured data we received shows that Cryptokartal operates without any known regulatory licence, has a small online review presence, and has drawn a predominantly negative reaction from the few clients who have left feedback. This article sets out our findings in detail, interprets what they mean for a retail trader, and delivers a clear, evidence-based risk assessment.

Company Background – A Paper Presence in an Offshore Haven

Cryptokartal is a trading name of Elmond Enterprise LTD, a company incorporated in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG). The brokerage appeared in 2019 and lists zero employees on official filings. This is a red flag in itself: a fully operational forex and CFD brokerage requires compliance, support, dealing, and technical staff. A zero-employee registration points to a shell company, with the real operational centre possibly located elsewhere, hidden from public view.

SVG is a well-known offshore jurisdiction for unregulated financial firms. It does not maintain a regulatory regime for forex or CFD brokers targeting retail clients, so incorporation there does not imply any form of oversight. We could not identify any physical office, management team, or year-end financial information. The corporate veil is completely opaque.

Regulatory Analysis – No Licence, No Safety Net

Among the most critical findings of our research is that Cryptokartal operates without a valid financial services license. Our records contain zero regulatory authorisations. The broker itself acknowledges it is “unregulated” in its own company description. This is not a technical gap; it has profound practical consequences for anyone who deposits money.

In a regulated environment (such as the UK, Australia, or Cyprus), brokers must segregate client funds, adhere to capital adequacy rules, and provide access to external ombudsman services. Regulated brokers also face regular audits and enforcement actions. None of these protections apply at Cryptokartal. If the broker fails, misappropriates funds, or refuses withdrawals, there is no financial authority you can appeal to. The risk of total capital loss is not just a trading risk – it’s a counterparty risk that sits at the core of this operation.

Account Types – What We Know and What We Don’t

Cryptokartal states it offers three live account types on the Leverate Activ8 platform. No minimum deposits, leverage limits, or spread ranges have been publicly disclosed. This lack of transparency makes it impossible to fairly compare the offering against other brokers.

Typically, unregulated brokers use tiered accounts to encourage higher deposits, often promising better trading conditions. But without independent verification – and given the withdrawal complaints we discuss later – traders should view any advertised advantages with deep scepticism. The absence of clear cost and risk information before account opening is a deliberate barrier that prevents informed decision-making.

Deposits and Withdrawals – The User Record is Troubling

Because Cryptokartal does not publish its funding methods, payment processing times, or withdrawal fees, we must rely on the real-user review record. And that record is bleak. Of the three deposit-related mentions we identified, two are explicitly negative and call the broker a scam.

One reviewer states plainly: “Facile capire che si tratta di TRUFFA dal momento in cui vuoi chiudere tutto, prelevare i 250€ depositati e prelevare anche il ‘guadagno virtuale’. Cosa IMPOSSIBILE.” [Easily understood that it’s a SCAM when you want to close everything, withdraw the €250 deposited and also withdraw the ‘virtual profit’. IMPOSSIBLE.] This is a direct claim that the broker refuses to return deposited capital.

Another reviewer warns: “Crypto Kartal TRUFFA? Sì Crypto Kartal TRUFFA! Prima di tutto non è assolutamente una piattaforma di trading regolamentata.” [Crypto Kartal SCAM? Yes Crypto Kartal SCAM! First of all it is absolutely not a regulated trading platform.] They go on to highlight the absence of CySEC and CONSOB licences and express high probability that invested funds are at risk.

These are not ambiguous complaints. They allege that when clients attempt to withdraw, the broker blocks the process. While any broker can be the target of isolated disgruntled users, the consistency and severity of these reviews – especially for a broker with only eight total Trustpilot ratings – is alarming. In our assessment, the withdrawal risk here is extreme.

Trading Platform – Legitimate Technology, Unchecked Environment

Cryptokartal says it utilises the Leverate Activ8 platform. Activ8 is a genuine white-label platform that provides charting, risk management, and trading tools. In a properly regulated context, it can be a solid trading interface. However, the platform alone does not guarantee a fair trading environment.

The one review that mentions platform experience is damning in a different way. The trader recounts being approached by a self-proclaimed finance expert, and when they refused to invest more and requested their money back, “ha iniziato con parolone volgari e il mio saldo è finito a zero in un battere” [he started with vulgar words and my balance went to zero in an instant]. This suggests possible manual interference with account balances or aggressive tactics by individuals linked to the broker, which is a serious warning sign that goes beyond technical glitches.

Instrument Range and Market Access – Unverified Claims

Cryptokartal claims to offer a wide range of forex and CFD instruments. No detailed product list is provided, leaving traders completely in the dark about actual market depth and access. In regulated settings, brokers must disclose instrument specifications, trading hours, and margin requirements. Here, there is nothing to verify.

When an unregulated broker makes broad promises about asset variety, it can mask that the actual offering may be minimal, with manipulated spreads or prices derived from third-tier feeds. Without independent liquidity or execution reporting, the “markets” on Cryptokartal’s platform may bear little relation to real-world pricing, making the odds of achieving genuine trading results slim.

Fees and Overall Cost Picture – An Opaque Blank

We found no public disclosure of spreads, commissions, overnight swap rates, or non-trading fees (withdrawal, inactivity, account maintenance). This opacity is incompatible with the standards of a trustworthy broker.

In practice, unregulated brokers can impose arbitrary charges, widen spreads dramatically during volatile periods, or apply hidden fees that erode account balances without the trader’s clear understanding. The already high risk of withdrawal refusal makes the cost picture even more irrelevant – because even if fees appear low on paper, the real cost may be the entire deposited sum.

What the Real User Reviews Tell Us

We analysed all available user feedback to understand the client experience. The sample is small – eight Trustpilot reviews – but the picture is remarkably one-sided. With a score of 2.3 out of 5, the broker sits in the low-failure zone, and the written comments confirm that dissatisfaction runs deep.

The only positive review (4 stars) claims the trader is earning lots of money from a small deposit. It is brief and devoid of specifics, raising the possibility that it could be solicited or incentivised. Such orphan positivity does not outweigh the multiple scam allegations.

The negative reviews are detailed and share common themes: denial of withdrawals, aggressive behaviour when clients seek to exit, and a complete lack of regulatory compliance. One reviewer even states they filed police complaints two years ago. These are not fleeting frustrations; they describe a pattern of conduct that any sensible trader should treat as a clear red flag.

Industry Scores and Composite Risk Assessment

We cross-referenced our findings with aggregated industry data, which assigns Cryptokartal an elevated Scam Risk Score of 50 out of 100. This is not a high-confidence “obvious scam” rating, but it reflects the combination of an unregulated offshore shell company, serious withdrawal complaints, and a complete lack of transparency. The absence of a higher score likely owes to the limited data volume – with only eight reviews and no cloned sites detected, the system avoids overfitting to a small sample.

However, in our editorial view, the human content of those few reviews is considerably more worrying than the score alone suggests. The direct, detailed accounts of being unable to recover deposited funds elevate the practical risk above what a 50/100 might imply.

Final Verdict and Safety Recommendations

FXCanary’s investigation finds that Cryptokartal presents an existential risk to any retail trader’s capital. The absence of regulation means there are no safeguards. The company structure is a hollow offshore shell. And the handful of real-world reports all describe withdrawal denial, account wipeouts, and aggressive conduct. In our assessment, this is not a broker suitable for anyone seeking a fair, transparent, and accountable trading relationship.

Our recommendation is to avoid opening an account with Cryptokartal entirely. If you have already deposited funds and are experiencing withdrawal difficulties, you may need to consider legal advice or a chargeback through your payment provider, though success is uncertain without regulatory backing. For anyone evaluating brokers, use this case as a benchmark: never trade with a firm that cannot demonstrate a valid licence from a major financial regulator.

What real traders report

Aggregated from 8 independent reviews across Trustpilot and Forex Peace Army.

Most praised
  • Deposits & funding · 1 mentions
Most complained about
  • Deposits & funding · 2 mentions
  • Platform & app · 1 mentions

Scam-risk findings

50/100
High riskFXCanary scam-risk score · lower is safer
  • No verified regulatory license on file
  • Registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (offshore, light oversight)

Our scoring method is published in full and weighs regulation, fund safety, company age, clone reports, complaints and independent reviews. FXCanary takes no payment from any broker it rates.

← Full Cryptokartal profile, live data & all user reviews