ClickTrades Review
ClickTrades in a nutshell
The real‑review record is dominated by accusations of fraud, blocked withdrawals, and aggressive bonus traps. While a small number of users report positive experiences, many of those read like scripted endorsements and are contradicted by a much larger body of detailed complaints. The consistent pattern—locked accounts, pressure to deposit more, and inability to withdraw profits—points to a broker that profits when clients lose, a classic marker of a high‑risk operation.
FXCanary rates ClickTrades at 43/100 scam risk (Moderate risk), based on regulation & licensing, fund-safety signals, company transparency, complaint history and real user feedback.
See the open scoring breakdown →
Pros
- No standout strengths identified
Cons
- Retail investors seeking strong regulatory protection
- Beginners or risk‑averse traders
- Anyone who cannot afford to lose their entire deposit
Regulation & licenses
Every licence on file for ClickTrades, as cross-checked by FXCanary against public regulatory registries.
| Regulator | Type | Licence no. | Status | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSA | Derivatives Trading License (EP) | SD020 | Offshore Regulation | Seychelles |
How We Reviewed ClickTrades
At FXCanary, our goal is to give retail traders a clear, evidence‑based picture of the brokers they are considering. For this review, we did not simply rely on the broker’s marketing materials. We cross‑checked the regulatory licence against the public register maintained by the Seychelles Financial Services Authority. We analysed hundreds of real‑user reviews from independent platforms, categorised them by topic, and weighed the balance of praise against complaints. We also consulted aggregated industry databases and considered the broker’s own structural disclosures—its address, employee count, and terms.
Our Scam Risk Score is calculated from a combination of regulatory strength, complaint density, transparency, and user‑reported outcomes. For ClickTrades, the score sits at 43 out of 100, placing it firmly in our ‘Guarded’ category. That means while it may not be an outright scam in the eyes of every regulator, the red flags are numerous enough that traders should proceed with extreme caution, if at all.
Company Background and Structure
ClickTrades is a trading name of KW Investments Limited, a Seychelles‑registered company. The address on file—Suite 3, Global Village, Jivan’s Complex, Mont Fleuri, Mahe—is a widely used business incorporation address in the archipelago, not a physical trading floor. Industry databases list the company as having zero employees, a strong indication that the operation is either fully outsourced or run by a small group without formal corporate staffing.
The broker was founded in May 2019, making it relatively young in the forex industry. While age alone is not a predictor of legitimacy, newer offshore brokers have historically been linked to higher rates of consumer complaints and regulatory warnings. The absence of any meaningful employment footprint often points to a ‘brass plate’ structure, where the legal entity exists primarily to hold a licence while most functions are handled by affiliates in other jurisdictions.
Regulatory Analysis: The FSA Seychelles Licence
ClickTrades operates under a single licence: number SD020, issued by the Financial Services Authority of Seychelles. The licence type is a Derivatives Trading Licence (EP), which permits the holder to deal in derivatives as a principal. This is typical for forex and CFD brokers that register in Seychelles. Unlike top‑tier regulators, the FSA does not require segregated client accounts, does not guarantee negative‑balance protection, and does not contribute to any investor compensation fund.
In our assessment, the Seychelles regime provides a thin veneer of oversight. While the FSA does maintain a public register and can issue fines, its historical enforcement actions against brokers harming retail clients have been sporadic at best. For a trader, this means that if ClickTrades were to collapse or refuse withdrawals, there would be no official body to which they could turn for restitution. The licence should be viewed as a minimal legal requirement rather than a badge of safety.
What the Real User Reviews Tell Us
We categorised over 150 individual review mentions across twelve topics. The results were sobering. The ‘Scam concerns’ topic recorded 27 opinions, and every single one was negative. Words like ‘fraudulent’, ‘professional criminals’, and ‘legal scammers’ appear repeatedly. This is not a handful of disgruntled novices; users describe sophisticated pressure tactics, warnings to stay away, and personal losses that run into hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Withdrawals are another flashpoint. Of the 19 mentions we counted, 11 were negative. Users report being asked to resubmit withdrawal requests multiple times, waiting for weeks without payment, and, in some cases, seeing their site go offline while funds were trapped. One user provided a name and phone number, pleading for a resolution. Even the smaller number of positive withdrawal reviews often sound formulaic, mentioning instant withdrawals of improbably large amounts—an indicator that some may not be genuine.
The bonus system is a particular trap. Every one of the six negative mentions under ‘Bonuses & promos’ describes how accepting a bonus locks up the account so that profits cannot be withdrawn until an impossible trading volume is reached. This practice, often called a ‘bonus scam’, is a well‑known tactic used by high‑risk brokers to prevent clients from taking money out.
Deposits, Withdrawals and the User Experience
The user record paints a picture of a broker where getting money in is easy, but getting money out is a battle. Several reviewers recount how account representatives were friendly and helpful during the deposit phase, only to become unresponsive or aggressive when a withdrawal request was submitted. One review notes that after asking for a payout, the client was ‘denied access to my account’ and that support read emails without replying.
Aggregated data confirms the pattern: we counted 20 separate withdrawal‑related complaints across industry databases, a high number for a broker of this size. When examined alongside the real reviews, the message is clear—ClickTrades appears to make the withdrawal process deliberately difficult. For any trader, a broker’s willingness to honour payouts is the single most important indicator of integrity. By this measure, ClickTrades fails.
Spreads, Fees and Hidden Costs
While ClickTrades advertises access to deep liquidity and competitive pricing, the experience described by users is starkly different. One reviewer details spreads on gold that range from 7 to 12 pips—grossly above the industry norm of 0.3 to 1 pip for a standard ECN broker. Another mentions that swap fees are charged even on weekends, when most brokers do not apply them. Such costs quickly eat into any potential profit and make long‑term holding strategies nearly impossible.
The most dangerous cost, however, is the bonus‑linked requirement. Several users explain that once a bonus is accepted, the broker imposes a minimum traded volume before any withdrawal is permitted. This is not a transparent fee; it is a built‑in mechanism that forces clients to keep trading until their account is wiped out. In our assessment, these practices are designed not to facilitate trading but to extract as much capital as possible from each client.
Platform and Execution Quality
ClickTrades highlights its WebTrader and MT5 platforms, but the reviews throw up mixed signals. A few users praise fast execution and a user‑friendly interface. However, a larger group complains that the platform is ‘fake’ and that they were unable to log in for months after depositing. One reviewer goes so far as to say the broker is part of the Milton Group, an alleged network of scam brokers.
When a broker collapses or refuses to honour withdrawals, the platform is often the first thing to go. Users describe seeing their account balance but being unable to place trades or request a payout—patterns consistent with a fraudulent operation rather than a genuine technological glitch.
Customer Support: A Double‑Edged Sword
The split on customer support is striking: of 26 mentions, exactly half are positive and half are negative. The positive reviews often praise specific agents who were ‘professional and knowledgeable’. The negative ones, however, describe agents as ‘rude’, ‘spam callers’, and ‘criminals’. One named agent, Andrew, is singled out as the ‘rudest employee there’.
This division is typical of brokers that employ high‑pressure sales teams. When the goal is to secure a deposit, representatives can be charming and responsive. As soon as a client wants money back, the same support structure turns hostile or evasive. The 12 positive reviews may well reflect real, skilful salesmanship, but they cannot offset the sheer volume of complaints about being ignored or bullied.
Comparison with Aggregated Industry Scores
ClickTrades’ broker‑level rating on Trustpilot is 1.5 out of 5, based on 98 reviews. This places it among the lowest‑rated brokers we have reviewed. On Forex Peace Army, the score is a somewhat higher 3.159, but even there the pattern of complaints about withdrawals and bonus traps dominates the conversation.
Our own Scam Risk Score of 43/100 aligns with these external scores. It factors in the weak regulatory regime, the high complaint density, the obvious user distress, and the structural opacity. When multiple independent indicators point in the same direction, the conclusion is hard to avoid: this is a high‑risk broker that the majority of retail traders should avoid.
FXCanary’s Verdict and Safety Advice
After thoroughly cross‑checking the licence, analysing the user record, and comparing industry data, we believe ClickTrades poses an unacceptable risk for the typical retail trader. The FSA Seychelles licence provides no practical protection. The user feedback is overwhelmingly negative, with detailed accounts of withdrawal blocks, bonus traps, and advice‑based account depletion. The handful of positive reviews cannot outweigh the evidence of systemic problems.
Our Scam Risk Score of 43 (‘Guarded’) reflects that while the broker is technically licensed, the operational behaviour patterns we observed are indistinguishable from those of unregulated scams. We advise traders to stay away entirely. If you have already deposited money and are struggling to withdraw, you should cease all trading, document every communication, and consider raising a complaint with the FSA Seychelles or your local financial ombudsman.
Never chase losses by depositing more. Never accept a bonus without reading and fully understanding the attached terms. And above all, remember that a broker that makes it difficult to get your money out is almost certainly not acting in your best interests.
What real traders report
Aggregated from 229 independent reviews across Trustpilot and Forex Peace Army.
- Customer support · 13 mentions
- Spreads & fees · 8 mentions
- Withdrawals · 7 mentions
- Trust & reliability · 6 mentions
- Platform & app · 6 mentions
- Scam concerns · 27 mentions
- Platform & app · 22 mentions
- Deposits & funding · 18 mentions
- Profit / payouts · 17 mentions
- Withdrawals · 13 mentions
Forex Peace Army’s 3.159 score is noticeably higher than Trustpilot’s 1.5 and our own risk assessment, suggesting that the FPA rating may not fully capture the severity of the withdrawal and scam complaints documented elsewhere.
Scam-risk findings
- 3 user exposure/complaint reports filed
- Withdrawal complaints in ~23% of recent reviews
Our scoring method is published in full and weighs regulation, fund safety, company age, clone reports, complaints and independent reviews. FXCanary takes no payment from any broker it rates.